
Cursor vs Windsurf in 2025 - Which AI Code Editor Should You Use?
The AI code editor space has exploded. Cursor and Windsurf are two of the most popular options—but which one is right for you?
This detailed comparison breaks down features, performance, pricing, and real-world experience to help you decide.
Table of Contents
- Quick Comparison
- Cursor Deep Dive
- Windsurf Deep Dive
- Feature Comparison
- Performance & Speed
- Pricing Analysis
- Best For Each Use Case
- The Verdict
Quick Comparison
| Aspect | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Base | VS Code fork | VS Code fork |
| AI Models | GPT-4, Claude, custom | GPT-4, Claude, Codeium |
| Context | @mentions, codebase | Deep indexing |
| Unique Feature | Composer (multi-file) | Cascade (agent) |
| Free Tier | Limited | Generous |
| Pro Price | $20/month | $15/month |
| Best For | Power users | Team collaboration |
| Learning Curve | Medium | Low-Medium |
Cursor Deep Dive
What is Cursor?
Cursor is an AI-first code editor built as a VS Code fork. It's designed to make AI a natural part of your coding workflow, not an afterthought.
Key Features
1. Composer Mode
Multi-file editing and generation. Tell Cursor what you want to build, and it creates/modifies multiple files at once.
Example use:
"Add a user authentication system with login, signup,
and password reset. Use NextAuth with credentials provider."
Cursor will create/modify:
auth.tsconfigurationlogin/page.tsxsignup/page.tsxreset-password/page.tsx- API routes
- Types
2. Cmd+K Inline Generation
Highlight code and press Cmd+K to:
- Edit selected code
- Generate new code at cursor
- Refactor or explain
Fast, contextual, precise.
3. Cmd+L Chat
Full chat interface with your codebase:
- Ask questions about code
- Debug issues
- Get explanations
- Plan features
4. @Mentions for Context
Reference files and symbols:
@filename.ts- Include specific file@symbol- Reference function/class@docs- Include documentation
5. .cursorrules
Project-specific AI instructions:
# .cursorrules
- Use TypeScript strict mode
- Prefer Server Components
- Use Tailwind for styling
- Follow the existing code patterns
Cursor Strengths
✅ Best multi-file editing - Composer is unmatched
✅ Excellent context awareness - @mentions work great
✅ Model flexibility - Use GPT-4, Claude, or both
✅ Active development - New features constantly
✅ Large community - Lots of tutorials and tips
Cursor Weaknesses
❌ Can be overwhelming - Many features to learn
❌ Expensive at scale - Token usage adds up
❌ Occasional lag - With large codebases
❌ Limited free tier - Quickly hit limits
Windsurf Deep Dive
What is Windsurf?
Windsurf (by Codeium) is an AI code editor focused on deep codebase understanding and autonomous coding capabilities. It emphasizes "agentic" AI that can take actions independently.
Key Features
1. Cascade (Agent Mode)
Windsurf's flagship feature. An AI agent that can:
- Read and understand your codebase
- Make changes across multiple files
- Run commands and tests
- Iterate based on results
Example use:
"Fix all TypeScript errors in the project and
run the tests to make sure everything passes."
Cascade will:
- Find all TS errors
- Fix them one by one
- Run
npm run test - Fix any test failures
- Repeat until clean
2. Deep Codebase Indexing
Windsurf indexes your entire codebase for better context. It understands:
- File relationships
- Import chains
- Function dependencies
- Project structure
3. Supercomplete
Enhanced autocomplete that understands:
- Multi-line completions
- Context from entire file
- Project patterns
- Your coding style
4. Flows
Pre-built workflows for common tasks:
- Code review
- Documentation
- Test generation
- Refactoring
5. Team Features
Built for collaboration:
- Shared AI contexts
- Team-wide indexing
- Enterprise security
Windsurf Strengths
✅ Autonomous agent - Cascade handles complex tasks
✅ Deep understanding - Excellent codebase awareness
✅ Lower price - More affordable than Cursor
✅ Team-friendly - Good collaboration features
✅ Less overwhelming - Simpler interface
Windsurf Weaknesses
❌ Newer - Less community content
❌ Agent can over-reach - Sometimes does too much
❌ Fewer model options - More limited than Cursor
❌ Less customizable - Fewer configuration options
Feature Comparison
Code Generation
| Feature | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Inline generation | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ |
| Multi-file generation | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ |
| Autonomous generation | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★★★ |
| Template/boilerplate | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★☆ |
Winner: Tie - Cursor for control, Windsurf for automation
Code Understanding
| Feature | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Single file | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
| Multi-file | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ |
| Full codebase | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ |
| External docs | ★★★★☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
Winner: Windsurf - Deeper indexing
Debugging
| Feature | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Error explanation | ★★★★★ | ★★★★☆ |
| Fix suggestions | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★☆ |
| Automated fixing | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★★★ |
| Debug sessions | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★☆ |
Winner: Windsurf - Agent can fix automatically
User Experience
| Feature | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Learning curve | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★★☆ |
| Documentation | ★★★★☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Community | ★★★★★ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Stability | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★☆ |
Winner: Cursor - Larger community, more resources
Customization
| Feature | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| AI model choice | ★★★★★ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Rules/prompts | ★★★★★ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Keybindings | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
| Extensions | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
Winner: Cursor - More model and customization options
Performance & Speed
Response Time
| Action | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Autocomplete | ~200ms | ~150ms |
| Cmd+K generation | ~2-5s | ~2-4s |
| Chat response | ~3-8s | ~3-6s |
| Multi-file edit | ~10-30s | ~10-20s |
Winner: Slight edge to Windsurf - Codeium's optimization
Memory Usage
| Codebase Size | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Small (<10K lines) | ~500MB | ~400MB |
| Medium (10K-100K) | ~800MB | ~600MB |
| Large (100K+) | ~1.2GB | ~900MB |
Winner: Windsurf - More efficient indexing
Startup Time
| Scenario | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh open | ~3-5s | ~2-4s |
| With project | ~5-10s | ~4-8s |
| Large project | ~10-20s | ~8-15s |
Winner: Windsurf - Slightly faster
Pricing Analysis
Free Tiers
Cursor Free:
- 2,000 completions/month
- 50 slow premium requests
- Limited to GPT-3.5
Windsurf Free:
- Unlimited basic completions
- Limited premium requests
- Access to all features
Winner: Windsurf - More generous free tier
Pro Plans
Cursor Pro ($20/month):
- Unlimited completions
- 500 fast premium requests
- GPT-4, Claude access
- Composer mode
Windsurf Pro ($15/month):
- Unlimited everything
- Full Cascade access
- Priority processing
- All models
Winner: Windsurf - Better price/value
Team/Enterprise
Cursor Business ($40/user/month):
- Admin controls
- Usage analytics
- SSO
- Priority support
Windsurf Team ($20/user/month):
- Team indexing
- Shared contexts
- Admin controls
- SSO
Winner: Windsurf - Half the price
Total Cost Analysis (Solo Developer, 1 Year)
| Tier | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | $0 |
| Pro | $240/year | $180/year |
| + Claude API | ~$50-200 | ~$50-200 |
Windsurf saves ~$60/year on subscription.
Best For Each Use Case
Choose Cursor If:
✅ You want maximum control over AI behavior
✅ You prefer GPT-4 or specific Claude models
✅ Multi-file Composer mode is important
✅ You value the large community and tutorials
✅ You need detailed customization (.cursorrules)
✅ You're doing complex architecture work
Choose Windsurf If:
✅ You want an AI agent that works autonomously
✅ Budget is a significant factor
✅ You work with very large codebases
✅ You're part of a team
✅ You prefer a simpler, less overwhelming interface
✅ You want faster performance
Choose Both (Power Users)
Some developers use both:
- Windsurf for daily coding and autonomous tasks
- Cursor for complex problems requiring fine control
The Verdict
For Beginners
Recommendation: Windsurf
- More approachable
- Better free tier
- Agent handles complexity for you
- Cheaper to upgrade
For Experienced Developers
Recommendation: Cursor
- More control and customization
- Better model selection
- Composer for complex tasks
- Larger community for tips
For Teams
Recommendation: Windsurf
- Half the per-user cost
- Team features built-in
- Shared AI contexts
- Enterprise-friendly
For Vibe Coders / No-Code Background
Recommendation: Windsurf
- Agent mode is more autonomous
- Less need to understand the code
- Simpler mental model
Overall Pick for 2025
For most developers: Start with Cursor
Why? The larger community means more learning resources, better documentation, and more tips for getting value. The extra $5/month is worth it for most.
But try Windsurf's free tier first. If the agent mode clicks with your workflow and you don't need Cursor's customization, you'll save money and time.
Migration Tips
Moving from Cursor to Windsurf
- Export your
.cursorrulesas reference - Install Windsurf
- Let it index your codebase
- Start with Cascade for familiar tasks
- Learn Flows for productivity
Moving from Windsurf to Cursor
- Install Cursor
- Import VS Code settings
- Create
.cursorrulesfrom your workflow - Learn Composer for multi-file tasks
- Explore @mentions for context
Conclusion
Both Cursor and Windsurf are excellent AI code editors. The "best" choice depends on:
- Your budget - Windsurf is cheaper
- Your experience - Cursor offers more control
- Your workflow - Agent vs. guided AI
- Your team - Windsurf has better team pricing
The good news? You can try both for free. Spend a week with each and see which fits your brain better.
Building with AI? DreamLaunch uses the best AI tools to ship MVPs in 28 days. Book a free consultation to discuss your project.
Need a build partner?
Launch your Cursor vs Windsurf with DreamLaunch
We deliver production-grade products in 28 days with research, design, engineering, and launch support handled end-to-end. Our team blends AI code editor, Cursor review with senior founders so you can stay focused on growth.
Ready to Build Your MVP?
Turn your idea into a revenue-ready product in just 28 days.
